Talk:Reunion (30 Rock)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reunion (30 Rock) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Reunion (30 Rock) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Reunion (30 Rock) is part of the 30 Rock season 3 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
July 29, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reunion (30 Rock)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Beloved Freak 22:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Gave it a slight copyedit, just a couple of queries for clarity. A couple of tweaks in references.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No problems
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Broad in coverage and focused.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Neutral
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No problems
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
No problems
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

No dead links or links to disambiguation pages.

Plot

Could there be a bit of an explanation as to why Geiss was in a coma, or how long? (Just in this section, the lead's fine)
- I think I got it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's not immediately clear why Jack is distraught that Geiss is remaining CEO; could you make it clearer that he was supposed to get the job (or whatever it is that's happening there!)
- Added.
"For upstaging them, Tracy and Jenna start doing his page duties..." - this sentence is not quite right grammatically because it suggests that T & J did the upstaging. It needs something extra at the beginning, like To pay him back for upstaging them, Tracy and Jenna... or As revenge for upstaging them, Tracy and Jenna...
- Done.

Cultural references

I didn't get the Obama reference, until I read her biog and saw that she went to Princeton. Could you clarify that? (remember your non-US audiences!)
- Of course.
"often making out" - this sounds a bit too informal, but I don't have an immediate suggestion as you've just said "kissing". Unless, you just have something like Liz's former classmates play Seven minutes in heaven, a game in which two people are selected to go into a closet or other dark enclosed space and do whatever they like for seven minutes, often kissing.
- Done.
"Later, Liz's classmates plan to Carrie her on stage..." - this is also informal, and a little obscure to the uninitiated, perhaps could be solved simply by quotation marks, like Later, Liz's classmates plan to "Carrie" her on stage
- Done.
"The bucket of blood is dumped, but misses her entirely." - again, I feel that "dumped" is a bit informal, but feel free to disagree. Also, I think it's clearer if that sentence comes after the explanatory one (that begins "This is a reference to...")
- I just removed it. The way I see it, it's better not to have it like that. IMO. IDK. What do you think?
  - Yeah, that's fine. I agree.--Beloved Freak 14:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Could you link the first instance of IMDb & spell it out, and delink the second & third instances of Entertainment Weekly?
- Done.
Not required now, but for further development, recommend adding publishers to all refs where possible.

Another good job, putting on hold.--Beloved Freak 22:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, good job - passed! --Beloved Freak 14:42, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, it is most appreciated. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Reunion (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]