Talk:Retransmission consent

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Controversial?

Do you think Retransmission Consent is a controversial law? Spencer H. Karter (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be. But the claim here should be backed up with citations. Actually, the rest of the article should be too. Barte (talk) 11:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this is more accurately categorized as a debate? 65.207.79.74 (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revereted Edit

I'd normally just respond directly to the person who reverted my additions, but it appears the person who did so made the edits anonymously. So, I post here.

I added several paragraphs to the "debate" section of this article, only to have them reverted anonymously with no explanation. References were cited, and I believe that both sides of the debate were fairly represented. The swift removal comes off as an action to suppress information.

Since I cannot open a dialog with the editor who reverted my additions, what actions are available to me?

Edits: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Retransmission_consent&oldid=prev&diff=841615405 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstoffa (talk • contribs) 19:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: they were removed without a reason given. I put back in, edited, with one paragraph that seemed more explanatory than about the debate in a higher section. Feel free to revise my revises. Barte (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a closer look, I've removed the paragraph relating retransmission consent to higher basic tier fees. The argument is WP:SYNTH: it's not directly in the sources. Nor could I find a source making this case online. Barte (talk) 14:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]