Talk:Retigabine
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Retigabine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Retigabine.
|
A fact from Retigabine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Europe
[edit]Hi - it would be helpful if someone would summarise the history of this compound with respect to the European Medicines Agency's review and approval. As it reads now, it seems like it's a US-only drug, whereas it was approved in Europe first and there's useful information from the EMA as to the product. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PetePharm (talk • contribs) 11:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that's a fair point. Will try to add some info later today. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Added in adverse reaction warned in today's FDA drug safety communication
[edit]Came in today's e-mail batch from the FDA mailing list.Wzrd1 (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)