Talk:Resistance to interrogation

Military history: Intelligence / British / European / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

"ostensibly"

The use of the word ostensibly has a connotation that there is some other (hidden) agenda. Since Wikipedia attempts to remain neutral, I have taken the liberty to change the wording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed8r (talk • contribs) 00:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issue of the uses of Torture

This sentence is very problematic "Especially moving into modern times, when information and technology is often more important than numbers in combat, and when torture has been used less often to humiliate and more often to extract information" has it even been proven that torture can actually extract information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaraK (talk • contribs) 04:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]