Talk:Resideo
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Revised article for review
[edit]Hello this is Nellie04. I have revised the initial draft of this article and I have posted it here for your review. I welcome any feedback on this version of the article. Nellie04 (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
1.2 m/billion of sales/earnings
[edit]I happened to see this edit and looked at this cited source out of curiosity. That source says billion, but as sales rather than as earnings. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Wtmitchell, thank you for making that observation. I changed it to sales to be consistent with the source language. In response to previous reviewer’s feedback that the subject does not qualify for a Wikipedia article based on the sources used, I thoroughly researched Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for companies and conducted a citation assessment on each of the article’s 21 sources. I removed two that did not meet the “significant coverage” guideline. Here is a summary of the remaining 19 sources. All 19 are independent, third-party sources where Resideo is the focus of each article, demonstrating significant coverage. Newsguard highly rates 11 of the 19 sources for transparency and credibility; the others have yet to be reviewed. After conducting this assessment, I believe the article meets all Wikipedia publication parameters. I was interested in your thoughts, and if you had any further suggestions for improvement before I re-submit through AfC. Thanks. Nellie04 (talk) 19:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)