Talk:Research Centre for Macedonian History and Documentation
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Content of at least one revision of the associated article was derived in whole or part from non-free copyrighted material on the website http://www.imma.edu.gr/imma/research/index.html. This material was (prior to placement or subsequently) freely licensed in a manner compatible for Wikipedia's use by the posting of one or more compatible copyright licenses on the external website. Though the release notice for the material, which is irrevocable, may have been later removed from view, or the URL may have changed or gone dead, an archive of that webpage, including the copyright release notice, is available at http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imma.edu.gr%2Fimma%2Fcopyright.html&date=2015-02-21. |
[Untitled]
[edit]With respect to the CorenSearchBot warning: CorenSearchBot is in error. The material for the article was obtained from the official site of the Research Center for Macedonian History and Documentation. Probably the http://hellenicgenealogygeek.blogspot.com/2010/04/museum-for-macedonian-struggle.html page obtained the material from the same, public domain source.
Vlas2000 (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Vlas2000. Please point me to the source, so I can verify the copyright status. Do you mean http://www.imma.edu.gr/imma/research/index.html? If so, that page is not public domain, rather the site generally claims copyright: http://www.imma.edu.gr/imma/copyright.html. Also not that absence of a copyright tag does is not the same as not-copyrighted. Thanks, CrowCaw 19:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Crow, I've notified the copyright owner about the problem with their copyright page and they've fixed it. It now shows clearly the the material is under a CC3 license, which I suppose is OK for wikipedia. Regards, Vlas2000 (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that works. I've attached the attribution templates accordingly. Thanks for working through this! CrowCaw 01:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)