Talk:Rephormula

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Black Metal (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Metal, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Black MetalWikipedia:WikiProject Black MetalTemplate:WikiProject Black MetalBlack Metal articles

Title?

Shouldn't the title of this article actually be Phormula (with a redirect for Rephormula)? I'd make the change myself but I thought I'd see whether anyone else thought there were compelling reasons for not doing this. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As writer of the article, I have the impression that Rephormula is more notable than Phormula.--Canniba loki 15:31, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is really tricky because I do basically agree with you, given the labels involved and whatever. However, that's not really my point. The album's title is Phormula... meh. I'm not sure I really care enough about this. It just looks a little odd that the article is titled after the reissue of an album. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a good alternative, ask about the correct title for this release in the talk page of WikiProject Albums.--Canniba loki 17:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]