Jump to content

Talk:Renilla reniformis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


There is a second member of the sea pansy known, R. mulleri. My source doesn't give me more than the name, through.

Where it says that luciferase has become important "recently," that recently should be deleted. It's a quote from 1988, and luciferase has been around for quite a while. It's also worth noting that in dual-luciferase assay Renilla luciferase is often compared to the much more commonly used firefly luciferase because they have different substrates. In this way, the reagents to initiate the luminescent reaction for the firefly luciferase can be added, then quenched, and the renilla luciferase can be assayed directly after in the same samples (for example, as a control.) This is important if only because renilla luciferase is rarely used as a reporter gene the way that firefly luciferase is used, and so it would be nice to explain what it is used for. http://www.promega.com/products/reporter-assays-and-transfection/reporter-assays/dual_luciferase-reporter-assay-system/ (Fourthandfifth (talk) 21:24, 11 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sea pansy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]