Talk:Remotely created check

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Demand draft was copied or moved into Remotely created cheque with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Requested move 16 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved with consensus (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 03:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remotely created cheque → Remotely created check – As this article describes a U.S. practice, it should use U.S. English spelling ("check", not "cheque"). Move blocked by redirect from proposed name to Demand draft, from which this article was partly derived; the redirect should be removed, and all links to that redirect should go here. RBBrittain (talk) 00:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Strongly support per WP:TITLEVAR, MOS:ENGVAR and original nomination. --RBBrittain (talk) 00:44, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and RBBrittain. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 14:29, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.