Talk:Relics of Muhammad

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Relics of Muhammad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relics of Muhammad

This article needs better sources (besides two 17th- and 19th-century Europeans) and a fuller discussion of context. It's rather bizarre that the names of the relics are given in Turkish. Where were these objects during the centuries between Muhammad's lifetime and the reign of Selim I, i.e. from the 7th to the 16th centuries? How common is the veneration of these relics? Does no one dispute their authenticity? The relics have a history, and we have not told it yet. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 21:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tradition of venerating relics

"Islam has a tradition of venerating the relics attributed to the prophet Muhammad" radically overstates the case, I think. Anyhow, that assertion is completely unsourced. Шизомби (talk) 20:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles White

Needs to be disambiged. It may well be he doesn't have an article. Шизомби (talk) 04:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google book is freely available here. Looks like the Charles White we are discussing does not have his own article. No middle name given, though the title page refers to him as Charles White Esq.Cliff (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Relics

This article needs a serious review. The sources are foreign and ill-informed with regards to the subject. At the very least, it can be combined with the already existing detailed and well sourced article called Sacred Relics.

Yozer1 (talk) 20:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus?

This page and the Talk page were recently changed from Relics of Muhammad to Relics of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). How was the consensus formed for justifying such a change? AstroLynx (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Relics of Muhammad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120406021737/http://www.islamdag.info/news/1413 to http://www.islamdag.info/news/1413

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:40, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]