Talk:Howard C. Reiche Community School

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from Howard C. Reiche Community School appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that 12 years after the U.S. Department of Education gave Blue Ribbon status to the Howard C. Reiche School in Portland, Maine, it was declared deficient under No Child Left Behind?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/March.

Wikipedia

Maine Low‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

thanks lucky!

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move back per request. Much of the opposition is not grounded in naming convention policy or guideline and the applicable common naming evidence does not support the opposition's position. I would note that a book search, in fact, supports the fuller title, and a book search should be defaulted to before even trying a web search because it tends to concentrate reliable sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reiche Community School → Howard C. Reiche Community School — Another user renamed this article as soon as the AfD ended, saying that "Reiche Community School" is the best name because it is the WP:COMMONNAME, as indicated by its use on the school website. Seeing that the other user reverted my subsequent page move to Howard C. Reiche Community School, it's time for a discussion. IMO, few elementary schools are so well-known as to have a common name that differs from the official name, and the evidence indicates that this school has several short names, none of which dominates. This school's website home page does say "Welcome to Reiche Community School," but the name on the bottom of the home page is "Howard C. Reiche Community School." The Antioch University paper cited in the article is entitled "Howard C. Reiche Community School." The Blue Ribbon School list[1] calls it Howard C. Reiche Community School -- and alphabetizes it under "H". The Portland Public Library website [2] calls it "Howard C. Reiche School." The school system website [3] calls it "Reiche Elementary School." The Portland newspaper article cited in the article calls it "Reiche School", and the Bangor newspaper story excerpted in the book by Glass and the East End PTO minutes both call it simply "Reiche". The architecture master's thesis identifies it as "Howard C. Reiche Community School," but uses "Reiche School" and "Reiche" as shorthand names within the text. Bottom Line: While it is clear that it often is called by short names, there is no indication that any one short name qualifies as a WP:COMMONNAME along the lines of "Bill Clinton" or "Rhode Island", and several sources use the full name. Thus, the best article title is the school's full name. --Orlady (talk) 05:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whether it is Reiche Community School or Reiche School, the Howard C. part is quite superfluous. I live literally around the corner from the school and colloquially no one includes the Howard C. part. It is most commonly referred to as simply "Reiche". Moreover, a google test shows that "Reiche Community School" is more common than "Howard C. Reiche Community School". Reiche School is perhaps the best option for the name, but one would think that how the school names itself on its' own website would be definitive.--TM 14:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What people call it in the neighborhood is not a particularly good basis for determining how it should be identified in an encyclopedia article. --Orlady (talk) 13:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How a subject defines itself is the most important factor, which is why the current name, which matches the website, should stay.--TM 19:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's your opinion, but your opinion is not consistent with the Wikipedia policy. The policy says "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it instead uses the name which is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources." The various sources I cited use a variety of different names, leaving "Howard C. Reiche Community School" as the most sensible choice. Your Google test doesn't prove your case. First, you need to remember that a lot of ghit results are not reliable sources. Also, while it is clear that the school is sometimes named without including the "Howard C.", the hit count for the shorter name is only about 1/3 higher than the hit count for the long name -- not a very large difference if you consider that all items that call this school the "Howard C. Reiche Community School" should also turn up in a search on "Reiche Community School". --Orlady (talk) 20:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Case is well made and documented by the proposer. The opposition seems to be purely a personal preference. Andrewa (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My opposition is based on how the school itself identifies itself, which is why I moved it.--TM 16:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and as has been pointed out above, this reasoning seems to be based purely on your personal views rather than on any Wikipedia guideline or policy. Perhaps the essay at Wikipedia:official names would help to clarify this, noting that it's the guidelines and policies themselves which are important, the essay is just a help at understanding them. And yes, it should also be noted that this proposal is reversing your earlier, unilateral move. Andrewa (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Howard C. Reiche Community School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]