Talk:Regine Velasquez/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Im sorry to inform the users involved with this article that i am quick fail it for various reasons :

Issues

Article:

Entire article needs to be rewritten, there are paragraph structure errors, and grammar errors.
None of the references are not formatted correctly, see WP:MOS.
Majority of the references are not reliable, ex youtube which is used countless times.
WP:OR violations. Most of the article does not contain proper or contains no references at all.
9 links to 9 different disambiguation pages. See here for how to correct.
Dead links, please see here
WP:LEAD violations, there should be no references in the lead.
Entire Theatre and Television sections are unreferenced, so it violates WP:OR

These are just some of the things i noticed right off the bat, article needs a major peer review before even considering another GA nomination. (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

:GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
(CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 21:11, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]