Talk:Reginald Stephey

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

--Matrix17 10:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)well i guess i is up to the majority to decide. but i just want to point out that wikipedia actually is a offender register, see all articles on serial killers, and murders and so on.. and reginald has killed 2 people. and is also the convicted drunk driver in a very notalbe case. but as i sayed is up to the majority to decide.--Matrix17 10:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

There are about 16,000 murders per year in USA alone - don't tell me all of them are notable enough for Wikipedia. --Strangnet 10:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No i havent even mentioned that all theese 16,000 murders are notable. im saying THIS is a notable case,we can not write about all those cases offcourse but we can write about all those who gets media attention and is intereseting like this one.--Matrix17 10:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He really is notable then, isn't he? I mean, he does after all return 58 hits in a well-known search engine. And the grand total of zero are from CNN, MSNBC, ABCNews, FOXnews etc. --Strangnet 10:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ive got 204 articles and hits on him. and many articles from truthfull sources.but as i sayed is up to the majority not only stranget--Matrix17 10:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Major american newschannels internet pages doesnt write lies.i guess--Matrix17 10:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you search his name without quotes you get 207 hits. About 149 of them have nothing to do with him or the accident. His notability is perhaps enough to put him in the article about Saburido. --Strangnet 10:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well let hear what mroe people thinks before we act.--Matrix17 10:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with not keeping this article. It's barely a page long and nothing else is likely to be added to it. In fact most of this article is redundant with info already on the Jaqui article CSZero (talk) 01:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, just went and did it. This article doesn't even seem to get enough hits to get people weighing in on it, and it's been over 2 1/2 years. CSZero (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]