Talk:Regimental combat team
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regimental combat team article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[edit]
I have reason to believe that this term is still being used. In Generation Kill (which is about the Iraq War) they talk about R.C.T. 1 as if it was a Division. Can anyone confirm this? 203.160.122.148 (talk) 08:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- The term is still commonly used in the Marine Corps today. The term RCT still refers to the regiment and its attachments, they are not referring to it as a Division.--Looper5920 (talk) 09:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles