Talk:Redlich–Kwong equation of state

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Equation of state#Soave modification of Redlich-Kwong|Soave modification]] The anchor (#Soave modification of Redlich-Kwong) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Expanding Article

Hey,

I'm expanding this article for a class. I was going to give a little bit more background to the equation itself, citing Redlich and Kwong's 1949 paper. I'll go into a little bit of their derivation of it. I'm then going to talk about some of the modifications that have been made to the equation over the years.

The expansion is a work in progress right now (28 April 2012). I'm open to advice, but it would be nice if I could have a few days to do what I'm going to do. I also created an article on Joseph Neng Shun Kwong, who doesn't currently have one.

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. JDS Chem 444 Sp2012 (talk) 05:02, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

do you have any reference for the range of adequateness p / p_c < T / (2 T_c)? I haven't found any source mentioning this fact except wikipedia. derda17 —Preceding undated comment added 14:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not. That information was already in the article (uncited) when I expanded it. It could probably be removed, unless you have a citation for it. JDS Chem 444 Sp2012 (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uppercase "p" for pressure?

Why are there several "P" instead of "p" for the pressure? There is no need to introduce a new symbol, is there? I will correct this.Eheran (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]