Talk:Redcap

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Removed vandalism--OinkOink 05:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

plagiarism

The paragraph about Robin Redcap is plagiarized from http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/Journals/Journal/817543. I would fix it, but I'm actually at work right now... Explody 18:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

>> Disregard that, I'd say that a good 75% of this is copied directly from the aforementioned website. Explody 18:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

>>> Actually, that site appears to have plagiarized from Wikipedia (see the September 7, 2006 version of this article) --71.212.86.103 (talk) 00:17, 15 August 2008 (UTC) A lot of websites copy things straigt from wikipedia. Lord loss210 (talk) 11:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Given we have appearances from medieval thru modern in popular legend of this fictional creature, this was a needless and arbitrary split in the first place. Regardless of validity of content, I think the material in not distinct or notable enough to warrant a separate page. Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Discussion

"In popular culture"

These all look trivial to me, plus the entire section is unsourced. If there are no objections, I'm going to remove the list. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 20:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Redcap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416001912/https://www.fablelegends.com/creatures/redcaps to https://www.fablelegends.com/creatures/redcaps

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]