Talk:Red Velvet (group)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 웬디러비 (talk · contribs) 08:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wendylove: I think this is a good article, but we can add up some information about concert tour section. There are many articles about it, so we can make it as a paragraph. Also, we must upgrade the draft of their sub-unit, Irene&Seulgi, to make readers more comfortable to understand. Until then, it is too early to put this articles on nominee. -- Wendylove (talk) 08:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@웬디러비: Hi Wendylove! I do understand your points for the nomination. :) However, I think that the concert tour section should have their own pages and not be added to the same article as Red Velvet. Not to mention that every pages of artists (singers, idol groups, bands, etc.) don't really explain or five information about the concert on the same article as the group. You can find another page/article regarding their concerts which is: List of Red Velvet concert tours. Hope this will help you understand! :) Another thing is that, I do agree with upgrading or publishing the draft for the page Red Velvet - Irene & Seulgi. However this has nothing to do with the article nomination itself. That is a separate page/article and I don't think that will affect the good article nomination. I myself think that the article is already a great page to be part of good articles. On the other hand, I hope that the page for Red Velvet - Irene & Seulgi will be established or made since they are notable enough to have their own article. Thank you so much Wendylove! Hope to hear your response very soon! Let's power up! :) LipaCityPH (talk) 13:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion: I think you might consider clean-up or cut down this article a bit. For example, the description of the songs should not be too overly detailed and perhaps would be more appropriate within their perspective album articles. Some other details written might be reworded to become a bit more succint as well. Good luck! :)--TerryAlex (talk) 03:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This review has not received any comments in eleven weeks. EN-Jungwon 08:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@웬디러비: @LipaCityPH: It has been months since this review was last visited and frankly speaking, this was not a proper GAN review to begin with. GAN reviews should be based on Wikipedia:Good article criteria and should generally not last longer than a week. Given the amount of time that has passed and the improper review, I have failed the GAN. If the nominator still believes that the article has met the criteria, you may consider re-nominating in the future. Best, ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding me. I don't know how to do review, so it should be ended right now. -- Wendylove (talk) 21:54, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]