Talk:Red Hook Park

Red Hook Park has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 3, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Red Hook Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that an artificial turf soccer field in New York City's Red Hook Park, donated by the Norwegian government, was destroyed by arson ten days after its dedication?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Red Hook Park.

Wikipedia

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that an artificial turf soccer field in New York City's Red Hook Park, donated by the Norwegian government, was destroyed by arson ten days after its dedication? Source: NY Times Sep 24, 1994
- ALT1:... that New York City's Red Hook Park was built on the sites of an unbuilt terminal railroad, a refinery, and a junkyard? Source: NYC Parks Red Hook Park History, NY Times May 4, 2018, Brooklyn Citizen Jul 19, 1940
- ALT2:... that New York City parks commissioner Robert Moses rejected a transfer of land for Red Hook Park to protest that the plot could be taken back on thirty days' notice? Source: NY Times Jun 22, 1934

Reviewed: Cortinarius britannicus
Comment: In the copyright violation detector, there is a blog post that copies a few sentences from Wikipedia; this is a false positive.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 22:23, 8 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

expansion checks out, QPQ checks out, I like the first hook, but I wonder if we could be more precise, both in the hook and the article? It strike me that the field was destroyed by vandals, not simply "burned", so if we can find a way of perhaps combining what's already there with the totality of it being destroyed, I think we have a winner. It's also probably a good idea to add "all-weather" before soccer field because for most of us, burning a load of grass on a football pitch is inconvenient but it'll just grow back, whereas burning some astroturf is pretty final... The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the review. Yeah, I agree mentioning that it was totaled is better. I've done that. Epicgenius (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just a tiny tweak, the article says it was destroyed "ten days" after the dedication, not "within ten days", so I think we can afford to be precise and reflect the NYT here. Then it's good to go. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks, I've done that as well. I might've misread the source at the beginning. Epicgenius (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

all good in the hood. Well done, nice work. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 14:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]