Talk:Red Circle (publishing)

Text and/or other creative content from Red Circle (publishing) was copied or moved into Martin Goodman (publisher) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

RS?

I'm concerned about the citation to PulpInfo, which is a defunct fan site. The editor, Richard Paul Hall, is not a published expert in the field, and so this appears to be a non-RS citation and should be removed.--Tenebrae (talk) 05:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the site is now defunct, and while I've added an archive link, the only source for a Hall quote is in an image's alt-text now only available through View > Developer. Combined with his not being a published expert in the field, this also augers for removing this cite. --Tenebrae (talk) 04:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Red Circle (publishing) be merged into Martin Goodman (publisher). Virtually all the content here has always been duplicated at the Martin Goodman article. The only difference is the list of pulp magazines, which can easily be added to the other magazine lists there. Tenebrae (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Merging: "If enough time (normally one week or more) has elapsed and there has been no discussion or is unanimous consent to merge, any user may close the discussion and move forward with the merger." Since it has been more than two months with no discussion, the merger is allowed. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]