Jump to content

Talk:Red Blooded Woman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRed Blooded Woman has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starRed Blooded Woman is part of the Body Language series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 3, 2014Good article nomineeListed
February 3, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 13, 2014.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that critics called Kylie Minogue's 2004 single "Red Blooded Woman" similar to the works of American music artists Justin Timberlake and Timbaland?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Red Blooded Woman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 17:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Prose

[edit]
Initial comments (which apply to the rest of the article)
  • About.com is not reliable
  • Hung Medien is also not reliable for release dates/track listings/writing/production credits
Lead
  • "Additionally" is redundant (both mentions)
  • "In the latter country" (I'm not sure if it can be worded like that. Also, it's redundant as the name of the country is already written in the name of the association)
  • "accompanying" is redundant
Commercial performance
  • FN17 shouldn't be in the middle of the sentence

Files

[edit]
  • The sound sample has 26 seconds which is roughly 10% of the total length of the song.

6 comments! This is a record for me (obviously for the less issues with a GAN). Congrats! pedro | talk 17:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Prism: Addressed all. Thanks a lot. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Red Blooded Woman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Red Blooded Woman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]