Jump to content

Talk:Red Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleRed Army was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 13, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 22, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 3, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 23, 2005, and February 23, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Unofficial Red Army Flag

[edit]

The article states that a flag with a yellow star on a red background was the unofficial flag, but when checking the source its actually stating that it was a myth with no basis. This implies that it never was an unofficial flag in any sense, and it makes me feel like the article should not include it since it has no historical usage according to the source. 75.235.201.216 (talk) 04:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Removed everywhere. - Altenmann >talk 00:37, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
"Banner of Victory #5" was raised just below a statue on the roof of the Reichstag building

Unlike marines and air force, Soviet ground forces did not have official banner [1]. Various army units did have their banners, such as the one in the image. - Altenmann >talk 00:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

conflict in losses

[edit]

Two sentences side by side give seriously differing "official" numbers:

  • " Officially, the Red Army lost 6,329,600 killed in action (KIA), 555,400 deaths by disease"
  • "The official grand total of losses amounted to 8,668,400.[3][4] This is the official total dead"

Come, mister tallyman, tally me banana. An clarification is due. --Altenmann >talk 02:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]