This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
The intent of recording artist royalties is to describe in detail how music artists and songwriters receive payment for their creative works through the sale of physical music (CDs, Vinyl records, etc.), sale of music digitally (iTunes, Amazon, etc.), streaming services (Spotify, Pandora, Apple Music, etc.), broadcasting (FM radio, AM radio, etc.), use in TV shows and movies, and in performances. Commonly artists have deals with record labels for distribution and marketing who receive much of the profit along with the artist, the songwriter, and the distributor or service the audio is bought from. - WClarke (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The name of this article is currently recording artist royalties. It could possibly be named music royalties, though that may be too general as the focus/direction of this article is how music artists receive pay and controversies surrounding how much they are paid in a neutral way. Though this article should outline music royalties in general, I feel the focus is artist compensation for use of creative works rather than solely from a business standpoint regarding record labels and companies, even though those aspects are important to the article. There might be a better title that is worded better, and there are also redirects that need to be made when this article draft is finished. Does anyone else have a different opinion or comment on the focus/direction along with the naming of the article? - WClarke (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
