Talk:Recessive trait

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
	This redirect is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Human Genetic History (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Recessive → Recessive trait – I'm not convinced this article should exist separately from Dominance (genetics), but as long as it does it needs a title in noun form. Recessive trait is more correct than Recessive gene and more general than Recessive allele. This should be fairly uncontroversial, but submitting an RM just in case. Paul_012 (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nouns are good. Support. Red Slash 01:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merged to Dominance (genetics)

Merge was unopposed here. Only a small amount of text was actually merged (on 6 January 2014). The redirect was done later (just now). TuxLibNit (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]