Talk:Real ear measurement

A fact from Real ear measurement appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that real ear measurement used by audiologists involves insertion of a probe to within 6 mm of the eardrum?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Real ear measurement.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 November 2015 by reviewer Spinningspark (talk · contribs).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DOI error?

Hello @Spinningspark: Regarding the category Pages with DOIs inactive since 2014 that appears on this page. When I Google 10.1044/1059-0889.0701.05 it finds [1]. Admittedly, you probably know more about this than I do, so could you please explain what's broken? Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know any more, but the doi link is definitely broken. You are right that it does not seem to be an editor error at Wikipedia, it is more likely upstream of us. It might be AJA have published the wrong doi or have not registered it properly, or it might be a fault at doi.org. I have used the fault form to report the error. In my opinion, dois are more trouble than they are worth. SpinningSpark 08:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jonesey95: for your fix! JMHamo (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95 was fixing something else. SpinningSpark 17:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]