Talk:ReadSpeaker
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Suitability as a Wikipedia page
[edit]Is this page a commercial ad or a true wiki-page? /Aake —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.20.76.50 (talk) 11:33, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- This page should be deleted as it now stands! 77.106.140.70 (talk) 13:27, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. While I tried to improve/clarify the page a bit, deletion is still be my preferred option. Hulten (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Any software articles that sit for over a year without independent references are reasonable candidates for deletion. I've just nominated this article at afd.Dialectric (talk) 16:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Unclear about the no-download requirement
[edit]If I go to a page with ReadSpeaker, it says "Missing plug-in". I tried this with several HTML5 compliant web browsers. With this understanding I changed the text on the availability. Can someone make this consistent by either changing the text on the no-download requirement or my changes, based on clear evidence? Hulten (talk) 15:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)