Talk:ReachLocal

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Notability

This organization has been nominated for deletion and deleted several times over the last few years for failing to meet the notability guidelines. I'm reading through the article and noting that it has all the same issues as it had before even though it has existed for a year and a half. Almost all the sources are self sourced and self promoting. The remaining "articles" are simply business listings. Out of all the sources only one source almost qualifies as an article and that's the IPO article however this would be categorized under "routine announcements". Please keep in mind there is no inherent notability in any organization. Meaning the presumption is for non-inclusion.

I'm going through the notability guidelines regarding "Depth of coverage" and i've noticed a few items the notability guidelines specifically mention do not count as sources of notability: "Inclusion in "best of", "top 100", and similar lists does not count towards notability at all" "brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business," i.e. the IPO article "quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources, or passing mention, such as identifying a quoted person as working for an organization." i.e. self published articles of which there's about a dozen "inclusion in lists of similar organizations" this applies to all the yahoo finance, crunchbase, iTunes, and deloitte business listings

I think it fails on the audience criteria. there's not broad coverage I think it fails on the independence of sources criteria. the only sources with any depth are self sourced promotional material. not independent ones. I see from the edit history this article has had significant edits for NPOV and one person has reverted it instead of coming to this talk page to hash it out. I think the original deletion of the material was sound.

So what i'm asking here is for someone to show that this company is notably. What has changed since the previous deletions of this organization from wikipedia? From what i see in this article it's virtually identical save for the manipulation of the references table counting the same self promoting source up to 10 times, falsely inflating the number of "sources" used for this article.

~~Jesse

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by education program and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2013 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 17:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]