Talk:rc (Unix shell)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rc (Unix shell) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Plan 9 (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plan 9, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Plan 9Wikipedia:WikiProject Plan 9Template:WikiProject Plan 9Plan 9 articles

Es (Unix shell) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 March 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Rc (Unix shell). The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

On 13 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rc to rc (Unix shell). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move

RC royial cycle rc shell → rc … Rationale: Just like mk its the only thing that is actually called rc … eeemess 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support eeemess 02:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move, obviously. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 14:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose Royal Crown ("RC") Cola. --Johnny (Cuervo) 21:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fonts

The fonts that used for code examples, which supposedly should be fixed-width (because they use either <TT>/</TT> or <PRE>/</PRE> constructs), are rendered just like normal fonts. I looked at the page source, and it really has some stylesheets that do explictly command that bogus behavior. How do we get rid of those bogus stylesheets? Pappires (talk) 03:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't look at the source, but FWIW, it renders fine (i.e. in a fixed width font) for me. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:32, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

,,More dynamic piping´´

How are the examples in that part of the article ,,more dynamic´´ than what Bash supports?

Yes, their syntax is simpler.

Yes, feel free to say ,,in rc, dynamic piping is much simpler.´´

No, rc is not ,,more powerful´´ in that aspect. Read bash(1) and stop fanboying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.116.207.116 (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The shell in question here is sh(1). In any case, reading bash(1) is a daunting task. It is longer than rc's entire source code by a wide margin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.225.161.132 (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 May 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Killarnee (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rc → Rc (Unix shell) – (and redirect rc to RC) Not primary topic by pageviews or long-term significance (not prominent in search results on Google Scholar/Books). Hameltion (talk | contribs) 18:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support many other uses are proper nouns but at least could be searched with lower case. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.