Talk:Raymond W. McDaniel Jr.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Raymond W. McDaniel Jr. be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Deletion?
[edit]This article is about the CEO and Chairman of one of the largest credit ratings in the world. There are many more articles worthy of deletion, specifically those about pharmaceuticals and other topics of extremely limited interest. There are hundreds of references to McDaniel all over business news online.
Request to review new Raymond McDaniel version
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fb/Yes_check.svg/20px-Yes_check.svg.png)
To any editor watching this page: for the last several months I have worked on a new draft of this article. This draft is posted to a my userspace here: User:Mysidae/Raymond W. McDaniel Jr. I wish to seek consensus to replace the current article with the new one, if interested parties agree that it is an improvement. It is important to mention that I have placed a request here rather than edit the article directly because I am a representative of Moody's and fully aware of Wikipedia's COI rules.
The new version is slightly longer than the current, and introduces features such as section headings and an infobox as well as carefully researched new information on Mr. McDaniel's career history and education. My aim with this draft is to provide an improved and focused treatment of Mr. McDaniel's career and biography, removing needless speculation and poorly written sections.
I should note that my draft does not discuss the change in Mr. McDaniel's benefits in 2010. An examination of the current version and reference leads me to make the following conclusions: the one independent reference used deals mostly with criticism of the Moody's board for making a change to McDaniel's potential payment should the company be sold. The events that would lead to such payment did not come to pass. The discussion of Dr. Henry McKinnell's salary belongs in his own article, if anywhere and is not appropriate this one.
I'd like to see this article improved and I hope to find consensus with independent editors to replace the current version with my draft. Many thanks, Mysidae (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've reviewed the article and the new draft, and think the new draft is the better article by far; and I'm content enough that the criticisms in the current article are handled - better - in the draft than in the windy and undue manner of the current article. I'm content, too, to see the very long paragraph on pay disappear, in part for the reasons noted and in part because it smacks of POV. The main thrust is in the sentence " This information was not publicly disclosed prior to its announcement, and no statement explaining the action was released by the Moody's Board of Directors" ... is rather like complaining that something was not announced before it was announced. I'd want to be convinced there's an encyclopaedic issue here before it returns. I'll copy the draft across in a few days time, if no concerns are expressed here in the meantime. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am very happy that you prefer this new treatment of the subject matter. I do also agree with your specific criticism of the complaints in the existing version. I look forward to the page being updated, when you feel enough time has elapsed and are able to revisit the topic once more. Many thanks, Mysidae (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- No probs. There being no long queue of nay-sayers, I have copied the draft across just now. Thanks again for your input and then your patience in these matters; much appreciated. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am very happy that you prefer this new treatment of the subject matter. I do also agree with your specific criticism of the complaints in the existing version. I look forward to the page being updated, when you feel enough time has elapsed and are able to revisit the topic once more. Many thanks, Mysidae (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- This is excellent, I am very glad that you have agreed to make this change. Many thanks, Mysidae (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Mid-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Articles with connected contributors
- Wikipedia requested images of business and economics people