Talk:Ravenna Kibbutz

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

United States: Washington / Seattle Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Hi, all. I shouldn't have clicked "Save" right away, and I need to add to this page. I'll do it this weekend. Please don't delete it until I've fleshed it out. Among Seattle intentional communities, and in the local Jewish world, the Kibbutz is shaping up to be a significant force. Thanks!

You need to assert why it is notable or it will likely be deleted. Law_{type! snype?} 11:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What constitutes notability? I read the Wikipedia notability guidelines, and there's clearly an ongoing debate. The Pacific Northwest has a sizable assortment of cohousing communities, and the Kibbutz is relatively new, but it may be the only Jewish cohousing project in the entire region. I think that's notable.Vonnenook (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In your own words, or paraphrase, why is it important? You don't have to establish notability to save it from getting deleted at this point, just tell everyone why this Kibbutz is noteworthy or important. Cheers. Law_{type! snype?} 23:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. I think we've had more media coverage than I've listed, and I'll try to bulk up the article a bit so it conveys notability. Thanks! Vonnenook (talk) 17:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]