Talk:Rascals (Star Trek: The Next Generation)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"they use comm badges" - communication badges
"With command function enabled," - With the command function enabled,
"After the events, transporter is used to return Picard," - After the events, the transporter is used to return Picard,

The wikilink for DNA should be on the first instance it is mentioned not the second

"This was part of an overall decline in ratings during the first part of the sixth season, the preceeding episode," - replace the first comma with a semi-colon
"received a rating of 13.4 percent" - sentence lacks a full stop

"Handlen said that the Miles/Keiko scene was "dramatically interesting", and said that the part of the episode with the Ferengi was "a nice mini-action movie that helps pick up a generally dodgy hour"." - reptition of the word "said"
"He said that it resembled the Star Trek: The Animated Series episode "The Counter-Clock Incident", and said that the first act of "Rascals" was compelling." - same issue as above

@MWright96: Thanks for the review, I've addressed those points as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]