Talk:Rare Beer Club

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 November 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Beer Low‑importance

	Beer portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Dylanexpert (talk · contribs) has been paid by Rare Beer Club on their behalf. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Removal of Importance tag

A reviewer, HighKing, placed an importance tag before the Review section, suggesting that the entire section be deleted, on the grounds that it was "promotional." I deleted this tag. The reasons he gave for including the tag on his own Talk page make no sense. He claimed that the entire section is promotional. HighKing is confusing promotion with self-promotion, which are two different things. If I linked to a website quoting a press release in which the Rare Beer Club praised its wares to the skies, that would be self-promotion. But in this section, I am linking to sites like Fortune, Popular Mechanics, and the Berghoff Beer blog, who are praising the club because they like it. They could be said to be "promoting" the club, in a manner of speaking, but it is ultimately their opinion, not the club's, and the article is simply reporting that fact.

To HighKing, I made the analogy of a Wikipedia article about a film containing a Reviews section. The Reviews section in that case would not be promoting the film, it would just be reporting what reviewers thought of it. This would be as relevant for a bad movie (like The Room) as a good one. If there were poor reviews of the Rare Beer Club, I would have included them, but I didn't find any. Frustratingly, HighKing did not even respond to my argument. He said that he was "surprised" that I had included the Reviews section at all. Yet the service the Rare Beer Club provides is a product, just like a film is a product, and people who are curious about the club would have a right to see those reviews on a Wikipedia article. In my opinion, the article would not be complete without such a section.

However, there was one reference to a review by The Chicago Tribune which on a second viewing I decided might be ambiguous, so I deleted it. Which shows that I'm not averse to correcting and improving the article, just to interpretations of the rules that make no sense to me, such as by reviewers like HighKing. Dylanexpert (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]