This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
What's the point of having the same article two times in the references, once the original from Bloomberg and once a copy (legitimate?) from Surgo Group? --129.132.9.111 (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
yeah no point, the references here are a bit of a mess to be honest. Way to many for the depth of the article. Need to look closely at the Search Engine Journal & Search Engine Land citations in particular. For example the 3rd reference to SEJ is adding very little value, simply commenting on the information present on the Bloomberg interview article. I also notice in some of the edit history of the page there are attempts to link to private firms (such as Backlinko) which is concerning. If no-one objects, I'll try look at adding some more primary info sources in a week or two? Kieran21 (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
