Talk:Randy Olson
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Thank you Mary Mark Ockerbloom
[edit]This was on my cleanup list and surprise it was done! Thanks @Mary Mark Ockerbloom: great work.Sgerbic (talk) 23:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Some proposed changes
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Per WP:V. |
- Information to be added: After the sentence "He returned to Townsville, Australia as a postdoctoral fellow at the Australian Institute of Marine Science, working for the Australian government studying the problem of the crown-of-thorns starfish and its destructive effect on the Great Barrier Reef." add the following: "He conducted experiments and published papers arguing that the prevailing “Larval Starvation Hypothesis” was incorrect. His research is still a central part of the debate over what causes the starfish population explosions."
- Explanation of issue: Adding further details to Science career section.
- References supporting change: [1] [2] Note: These references can be found on this page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Crown-of-thorns_starfish
Mattmdavid (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Mattmdavid
References
- ^ Olson, Richard Randolph (1987). "In situ culturing as a test of the larval starvation hypothesis for the crown-of-thoms starfish, Acanthaster planci". Limnology and Oceanography. 32 (4): 895–904. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987LimOc..32..895O/abstract https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.4319/lo.1987.32.4.0895
- ^ Wolfe, Kennedy; Graba-Landry, Alexia; Dworjanyn, Symon A.; Byrne, Maria (2017). "Superstars: Assessing nutrient thresholds for enhanced larval success of Acanthaster planci, a review of the evidence". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 116 (1–2): 307–314. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094041)
Reply 23-OCT-2019
[edit]- A claim made in the requested prose, that the subject's reasearch
"is still a central part of the debate over what causes the starfish population explosions"
has not been referenced, nor does it adequately explain how and in what way it remains a "central part" of the debate. Please provide references which speak not only to the subject's research, but the science community's response to that research as it fits into the wider narrative of starfish population theories. This information should then be requested to be added to the appropriate article on starfish.
Regards, Spintendo 22:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Proposed changes -reworked
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- Information to be added: After the sentence "He returned to Townsville, Australia as a postdoctoral fellow at the Australian Institute of Marine Science, working for the Australian government studying the problem of the crown-of-thorns starfish and its destructive effect on the Great Barrier Reef." add the following: "He conducted experiments and published papers arguing that the prevailing “Larval Starvation Hypothesis” was incorrect."
- Explanation of issue: Adding further details to Science career section. Resubmitting this edit request without the line "His research is still a central part of the debate over what causes the starfish population explosions." as no direct sources to support this line could be found.
- References supporting change: [1] [2] Note: These references can be found on this page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Crown-of-thorns_starfish
Mattmdavid (talk) 15:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Mattmdavid
References
- ^ Olson, Richard Randolph (1987). "In situ culturing as a test of the larval starvation hypothesis for the crown-of-thoms starfish, Acanthaster planci". Limnology and Oceanography. 32 (4): 895–904. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987LimOc..32..895O/abstract https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.4319/lo.1987.32.4.0895
- ^ Wolfe, Kennedy; Graba-Landry, Alexia; Dworjanyn, Symon A.; Byrne, Maria (2017). "Superstars: Assessing nutrient thresholds for enhanced larval success of Acanthaster planci, a review of the evidence". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 116 (1–2): 307–314. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094041)
- As I indicated in my review above, this information is germane to the article on starfish or Crown-of-thorns starfish, and is not necessarily germane to the subject's article — which is ostensibly about the subject and not the subject's research. Regards, Spintendo 23:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Removing advertising-like content
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- I noticed this page has been flagged for having advertising-like content. I believe the offending section is "Story Circles Narrative Training Program" under Film Career. Since we don't have a good neutral 3rd party source to reference from, can we have the "Story Circles Narrative Training Program" section deleted entirely? Would that bring the wiki article back to a neutral enough stand point to have the advertising content warning removed?
Mattmdavid (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Mattmdavid
- Thanks for discussing the matter.
- I don't think the tag should be removed without careful, independent review.
- I removed the unreferenced section. --Ronz (talk) 22:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't notice the COI declaration. Thanks.
- Any content verified solely by primary sources should be considered for removal if better sources are unavailable.
- Any content verified by public relations pieces or the like should be similarly considered for removal.
- Please identify all such references for next steps. --Ronz (talk) 03:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Primary sources removal/clean-up
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Have a list of suggestions below to help clean-up the article and remove the advertising tag. It should be noted I have a COI. Any help is appreciated. (And a thank you to Ronz for being so patient with me).
- Remove “(born October 3, 1955)” - no reference available
- Remove: “Then, in 2001, Olson collaborated with Jeremy Jackson, Steven Miller of University of North Carolina, Wilmington, and movie producer Gale Anne Hurd to create the Shifting Baselines Ocean Media Project.” Replace with: “In 2002, Olson collaborated with Jeremy Jackson and movie producer Gale Anne Hurd to create the Shifting Baselines Ocean Media Project.” Remove old press kit reference. (http://www.sizzlethemovie.com/SIZZLE_PRESS_KIT.pdf). New reference supporting the change: [1]
- Remove "Initial funding came from the three founding partners: The Ocean Conservancy, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Surfrider Foundation." - No reference available.
- Remove: “Since then the project has produced a series of short films, television commercials, Flash videos and contests (stand up comedy, photography, video) all written and directed by Olson.” Replace with: “The project has produced a series of widely aired television commercials, short films, and informative online slideshows starring the likes of Jack Black, Dustin Hoffman, and the Groundlings Improv Comedy Theater.” References supporting the change:: [2] [3]
- Only primary sources exist for the following section - no third party references available. Should this part be deleted? I'll leave it up for the editor who takes this to decide on whether to delete or not. “One piece of media produced was the Ocean Symphony Public Service Announcement (PSA) which featured a symphony of comic actors playing instruments they didn't know how to play, to symbolize ocean disharmony. This included Tom Arnold on kettle drums, Madeleine Stowe and Paul Michael Glaser on violin, Henry Winkler on harp, Sharon Lawrence on cymbals, and Jack Black as conductor.” Note: Direct link to YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC5P7mBu_XY&
- Remove "40 Years of Silence In 2014 this film showing the POW experience of Olson's father, Colonel John Eric Olson, was presented and discussed at West Point USMA." - No reference available.
- Any remaining primary sources in the article have third party sources as additional references.
Mattmdavid (talk) 00:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
References
Reply 14-NOV-2019
[edit]I have effected a general cleanup of the article, removing the requested items.
- Additional claims were either (a) removed or (b) not implemented as the suggested replacements — both of these actions occurring only when those items were referenced by the subject or those closely affiliated with the subject's work (such as the scripps.ucsd.edu source).
- I have placed the filmed work as an embedded list rather than using level 3 subheadings, since an individually filmed work is not its own separate topic within the umbrella topic of Films. An article straddling the line of WP:PROMO needs to demonstrate an economy of subheadings.
- The Books section was revised to list just the book information without the extraneous descriptions of those works.
- The Bibliography section was removed, as it duplicated all the items in the Books section. (This section also inexplicably contained references for each listed item, which unnecessarily padded the references section.)
- The Criticism section ought to be incorporated into the main prose per WP:CSECTION, but as there are two main sections (Science and Film) I'm not sure which section that should be.
I'll leave the template open to garner additional feedback. Regards, Spintendo 13:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed changes - minor edits and advertising tag
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I have a COI with Randy Olson and am hoping to have an editor make the following changes.
- Minor change, increase the number of books from three to four. The line “He is also the author of three books aimed at helping communicate science more effectively with the general public.” should be changed to “He is also the author of four books aimed at helping communicate science more effectively with the general public.”
- Add Surfline Magazine citation to this sentence: “The film documents the three massive swells that hit Fiji and Tahiti in 2011-12.” [1]
- I was hoping whoever edits this could give advice on any sections that would still warrant the use of the Advertising Warning tag on this page. Spintendo and Ronz have done an excellent job of helping me clean up primary sources and offending material. Could whoever edits this notify me of any other offending material that would warrant the use of the Advertising Warning tag? If not and the article looks clean, I would request that the tag be removed.
Mattmdavid (talk) 00:38, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Mattmdavid
- I removed the mention of the books from the lede. It appears undue and promotional, especially without the required reference. If there is a reference that verifies most of it, please identify it.
- I don't understand the need for a second reference for White Rhino. Why is it needed, or how does it help? --Ronz (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have some references to support the mention of books in the lede. Are the below enough?
- A book review mentioning how “Houston, We Have a Narrative” is a book on teaching scientists how to write narratively about their work. (https://jcom.sissa.it/sites/default/files/documents/JCOM_1505_2016_R01.pdf).
- "Science Communication: Narratively Speaking," “Don’t be such a scientist: talking substance in an age of style,” and “Houston, we have a narrative” are cited in this case study on improving storytelling for inspiring publics, promoting understanding of science, and engaging publics more deliberately in science. (https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/18/05/JCOM_1805_2019_N01#X0-Olson2013)
- A review of “Connection : Hollywood storytelling meets critical thinking” that discusses how the book is meant to help scientists communicate outside their field. (https://www.botany.one/2014/05/connection-hollywood-storytelling-meets-critical-thinking-olson-barton-palermo/)
- Andrew Revkin, a former senior editor of Discover magazine and renowned scientist and educator, talks about “Connection : Hollywood storytelling meets critical thinking” and “Don’t be Such a Scientist” as books for helping with science communication in this article. (https://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/09/can-storytelling-be-factual-and-effective/)
- Fair point about the new White Rhino reference. It is probably unnecessary.
- Are there any other offending sections you can find that would warrant the advertising tag?
- I have some references to support the mention of books in the lede. Are the below enough?
Mattmdavid (talk) 04:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Mattmdavid
- My understanding is that book reviews lend little weight to subjects outside the book itself. Nothing provided demonstrates the need to highlight the number of books so. --Ronz (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- That’s fair. But since he does have his books on science communication listed down in the Books section, should at least some mention be made in the lede? How about something simple like: “He is also the author of books on science communication.” I think the reviews I posted above should be proof enough to illustrate that. Thoughts?
- And any other parts that we need to look at for the advertising tag removal? Mattmdavid (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Mattmdavid
- Requests to remove the advertising maintenance template ought to first be asked of the editor who assigned the template in order to find out from them if it can be removed. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether or not the issues which caused its placement have been corrected. Regards, Spintendo 09:40, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- My understanding is that book reviews lend little weight to subjects outside the book itself. Nothing provided demonstrates the need to highlight the number of books so. --Ronz (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Proposed change - Adding Randy's high school
[edit]![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works. |
I have a COI with Randy Olson and am hoping to have an editor make a change.
- “Olson's family subsequently moved to Virginia, then Kansas City, Kansas where he attended high school and began college at the University of Kansas.” I’d like to specify the high school using a secondary source: “Olson's family subsequently moved to Virginia, then Kansas City, Kansas where he attended Shawnee Mission Northwest High School and began college at the University of Kansas.”
Source reference supporting this change: https://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/jan/04/dodos_circling_around_id/
Mattmdavid (talk) 22:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Mattmdavid
- Hi, i was reviewing this edit request. I am not sure that this information is really relevant... Besides, the source provided does not look totally reliable. Unless some other editor disagrees, i would recommend not implementing the change on these grounds. Victrue (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not quite convinced about the encyclopedic value said edit would bring, let alone the reliability of the reference. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 18:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Victrue and Nearlyevil665. Although the source may be right, the name of his high-school doesn’t increase the value of the article.Ferkijel (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | The user below has a request that a significant addition or re-write be made to this article for which that user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is moderate. Please be patient. There are currently 132 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
I have a conflict of interest and am looking for another editor to assist in adding the following changes. Please feel free to rewrite any of my suggestions in a way more suitable to Wikipedia.
- What I think should be changed (include citations):
1. Add further detail to an existing paragraph.
Current paragraph: In 2002, Olson and coral reef ecologist Jeremy Jackson of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, created a 7-minute short film, Rediagnosing the Oceans.
Proposed revision: In 2002, Olson and coral reef ecologist Jeremy Jackson of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, created a 7-minute short film, Rediagnosing the Oceans. Olson broadened this work with his 2002 LA Times Oped and the Shifting Baselines Ocean Media Project.
Citation: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-nov-17-op-olson17-story.html
Related Wikipedia article that already references Randy Olson and Shifting Baselines Ocean Media Project: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Shifting_baseline
2. Add a new section after Film Career.
Section Header: THE ABT NARRATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR STORY STRUCTURE
Paragraph: Olson formulated and presented the ABT (And, But, Therefore) Narrative Template with his 2015 book, “Houston We Have A Narrative: Why Science Needs Story.” It was derived in part from screenwriting instructor Frank Daniel whose course Olson took at USC School of Cinematic Arts. Olson has broadened the application of the ABT into a wide range of disciplines through his series of “Narrative Gym” books for business, law, politics, science and medicine.
Citation: https://ensia.com/voices/science-communication/
Citation: https://www.wissenschaftskommunikation.de/how-and-but-therefore-improve-science-stories-80893/
- Why it should be changed:
1. Add further detail to an existing paragraph. This is my attempt to provide missing info on Randy Olson that is mentioned in the Shifting baseline Wikipedia article.
2. Add a new section after Film Career. I'm attempting to add detail to the gap after Randy's film career in which he developed the ABT Narrative Framework. The Ensia and Wissenschafts Kommunikation articles provided details to fill that gap.
Mattmdavid (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
References
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Declined requested edits
- Implemented requested edits
- Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests