Jump to content

Talk:Randolph, Tennessee/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

starting GAreview.Pyrotec (talk) 20:15, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I've read the article in depth and also looked at the comments/discussions in GA/1. I'm satisfied that this article meeting the requirements of GA.

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 21:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I appreciate your evaluation of the article. doxTxob \ talk 05:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]