Jump to content

Talk:Randall–Sundrum model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like 5 dimensional warped geometery theory is an effort to describe the Randall-Sundrum model from a non-technical point of view. As such, it probably has some material that would be useful to merge into this article. -- SCZenz (talk) 10:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very true. Stupidly, I wrote the article before making a thorough check for it. Now that I have found the Randal-Sundrum models article, I say that merging is a good idea. Mixen Dixon (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC) Agree This page should be merged. Kivar2 (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree You also created the article with a misspelling in the article name. I brought it up on the article's talk page and an admin moved the article to the correctly spelled name. Dr. Morbius (talk) 04:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Clearly both articles describe the same model. (TimothyRias (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Naive question on practical consequences

[edit]

Ok, as soon as "warp factor" was mentioned, this question became inevitable. What "glues" us to the Tevbrane, and is this in any sense negotiable? Scottwh (talk) 14:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Why are there three references to work by Gogberashvili, but none by Randall and/or Sundrum? It almost seems as though someone wants to make an argument for priority for Gogberashvili against Randall and Sundrum and is using the Wikipedia article to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.90.66 (talk) 18:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gogberashvili edited thts to push his stuff from arxiv.i VerdanaBold 19:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]