Talk:Rampilla Narasayamma/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Jannatulbaqi (talk · contribs) 14:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 22:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this. This article will need to pass each of these critera to become a good article.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I am going to quick fail this. It has original research, uncited statements and is not illustrated. If you try again you need to find citations for all statements, expand the page, and if possible find an image. History6042 (talk) 22:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.