Talk:Ralph Underwager

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ralph Underwager article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evangelical Christianity Low‑importance

	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Evangelical Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Evangelical Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Evangelical ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject Evangelical ChristianityEvangelical Christianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source

[1] WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 16:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POV

This article was clearly written by someone with an axe to grind. It used (and still does, after I got rid of some of the worst examples) language chosen to persuade readers that this person was ridiculous, and seemed to poke fun of claims that were written in a way that suggested they were insane but have actually been overwhelmingly supported by scientific studies (how interview questions can lead people, especially children, to give answers that are wanted instead of being accurate, etc.). It even went so far as to call a case where people were exonerated of all accusations made against them a case of child abuse and suggested that the organization was formed to defend people the worded suggested were guilty even if law concluded they weren't. Some of the sources selected are very strongly biased, and a more thorough representation of reliable sources should be used.

We've had many problems with related articles, such as satanic ritual abuse and False Memory Syndrome Foundation. Hopefully some of the people who brought those articles back to WIkipedia standards will work on this one also. DreamGuy (talk) 21:33, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As usual, the POV-pusher will start out claiming any party with an opposing interpretation of an event or situation is the POV-pusher. At least this article isn't in nearly as bad shape as some others. Daniel Santos (talk) 09:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]