This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota
Do an online search on Ralph Kiffmeyer. If it weren't for the attempt to outlaw adult toys, his single term in the Minnesota House would be completely forgotten. Can you find a source for anything ELSE he is notable for, besides that and being married to the Secretary of State? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blind carbon copy (talk • contribs) 21:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The only reason he is "notable" for that is your point of view. You are not giving a balanced representation of the issue, simply smearing with a negative column from a liberal paper. If you feel this is the only reason he should be in Wikipedia, then feel free to remove the listing.--192.236.20.7319:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]