Talk:Rakuita Vakalalabure

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Fiji Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Rakuita Vakalalabure is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

I have undeleted this article, which I believe was deleted unjustly. This is not an "attack page." Anyone objecting to negative or unsourced information on it should delete the information, not the article. You didn't delete Bush's bio, did you? You only deleted unsubstantiated attacks. Why do you treat Fijian politicians differently?

By the way, I couldn't take part in discussions before this and other deletions - I simply haven't had time to be around much in the last two or three years. But I'm appalled to see how articles about prominent people are being axed instead of cleaned up. I agree, this is one of MANY articles that is in desperate need of a cleanup. But you don't burn a house down just because it's dirty. David Cannon (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]