Talk:Rajiv Bajaj
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Puneet3210 (talk) 04:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Rajiv Bajaj is a strong personality in the Auto business. However, he has always been shy of the media and you don't find more information about him on the web. The page is an effort to gather more information about him so that it can help wikipedia users. I have tried to add as much information as I know. I am sure that more users will add more information. So, pl do not delete this page. Rather, try to enhance this page with more information/content.
Why would you delete this page? What do you mean by lack of "asserted" importance? Rajiv Bajaj is the Scion of one the oldest industrial family, don't honk it should be deleted. Exist2015 (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (There is no significant references available. This article cannot be created on behalf of only that, he is son of [[Rahul Bajaj, chairman of the (Bajaj Group) --Preeti Sharma's Knowledge (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- There are several reasonable citations, and when I searched earlier I found what I felt was sufficient evidence on the Web of his notability. The article didn't meet the criteria for a {{db-spam}} tag, and I've neutralized a couple of parts that weren't neutral. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2015 (UTC)