Jump to content

Talk:Rainey Bennett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Regarding this edit: I think the link in the notice is wrong and should be this one instead: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-12-15/news/9812150313_1_art-institute-mr-bennett-chicago . As the notice says not to change it, what is the appropriate course of action? Or is it a moot point, as long as the text is amended appropriate? isaacl (talk) 23:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The key part is not which link is being copied - but whether this article does copy exact wording sans proper attribution of such. I do know it caused the plagiarism detector to have a fit <g>. I came here because of philately of all things ... but some of the wording struck me on this and other articles as not natural <sigh>. Collect (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to make a note, since when I visited the referenced link and didn't see any overlap with the deleted lead, I was uncertain where the text was apparently copied from. isaacl (talk) 00:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - I believe the cite I gave is a fit for the second section - you might look at that. I really can not believe that this sort of writing is still going on in Wikipedia though. Again - thank you. I think several sources might be involved for sure. Collect (talk) 00:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20141010001237/http://www.chicagomodern.org/artists/rainey_bennett/ and http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1998-12-15/news/9812150313_1_art-institute-mr-bennett-chicago. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional copyright issues were scattered throughout the article beyond the flagged section and have been removed or, in one case, rewritten. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]