Talk:Rafael Buenaventura
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Rafael Buenaventura appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Tabula rasa
[edit]I've archived the discussion, which had not been added to for 18 months - wormcast (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
"Prominent"
[edit]I don't know if some here are aware of the meaning of "prominent". "Prominent" and "competent" or "professional" or "experienced" are not synonyms. --Bone1234 (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Referred to this edit. Bone1234 (talk) 02:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, "prominent" in this context meant "leading, important, or well-known" - all of which describe Mr. Buenaventura as a banker prior to his appointment as Governor. He could very well have been a low-profile crony until said appointment made him prominent, but he was not. Hence the use of the term is not redundant. Besides, last time I checked, notability was the standard for Wikipedia inclusion (WP:N), not prominence; it is not automatically the case that someone is prominent simply because they are notable. -Wormcast (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Your talk doesn't really have any sense, but in my observation... Bone1234 (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, "prominent" in this context meant "leading, important, or well-known" - all of which describe Mr. Buenaventura as a banker prior to his appointment as Governor. He could very well have been a low-profile crony until said appointment made him prominent, but he was not. Hence the use of the term is not redundant. Besides, last time I checked, notability was the standard for Wikipedia inclusion (WP:N), not prominence; it is not automatically the case that someone is prominent simply because they are notable. -Wormcast (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)