Talk:Radon/GA3

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article contains a lot of unaddressed citation needed tags (most of them years old), thus failing criterion 1b, which requires citations for statistics and challenged material. I will wait a week before closing this reassessment so editors can have the opportunity to fix these issues.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 01:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've handled all but two of them. DMacks (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...which User:King jakob c 2 and I cleared. DMacks (talk) 08:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: Hold on, the article contains at least 5 one-sentence paragraphs (mostly in the Application and Health risks sections). MOS:PARAGRAPHS (which is part of MOS:LAYOUT, whose guidelines need to be met to satisfy criterion 1b) says: "The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized." --FutureTrillionaire (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All done (I think?) except for the "industrial radiography" in Radon#Scientific. DMacks (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done that one now also. DMacks (talk) 21:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. All the issues I've found have been fixed.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Kept.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 22:27, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this article mentions a study that found only an increased risk when exposed to passive smoking, should that not be mentioned in the domestic-level exposure section? Sounds important enough, it means that most people don't have to worry about radon! Ssscienccce (talk) 08:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]