Talk:Radoje Pajović/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 20:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

All looks pretty good.

• "figures, who" Delete the comma
• "a politically motivated, popular trend in historiography" -> "a politically-motivated popular trend in historiography"

• "He accused the same groups of historical revisionism against the anti-fascist struggle in Montenegro and its legacy." It is unclear who is referred to, and what are the "same groups"? There is an ambiguity between Amfilohije and Pajović.

I made a change to suppress a warning. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look, Hawkeye! All done. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Looks good

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.