Talk:Radio Rosa

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan status?

I have just linked to this article via a new article I created, Danish National Association of Gays and Lesbians. Is there others we could link it to? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherryleaf (talk • contribs) 20:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the criteria for Orphan status, and it seems that Radio Rosa is linked to more than 3 times within Wikipedia, so I have removed the tag. Of course, please just put it back on if that was actually in error! Cherryleaf (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]