Talk:Racing Louisville FC

A fact from Racing Louisville FC appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 August 2020, and was viewed approximately 922 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the name of the women's soccer team Racing Louisville FC is inspired by Louisville's famous horse races?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Racing Louisville FC.

Wikipedia

Football: American & Canadian / Women's football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Women's association football portal This article is supported by the women's football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's sport Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Kentucky / Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as High-importance).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Behind the creation of Racing Louisville's new identity (July 8, 2020; The Athletic; subscription required)

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the original name for Racing Louisville FC was reconsidered after a mixed reception from fans? Source: Courier-Journal
- ALT1:... that the name for women's soccer team Racing Louisville FC is inspired by Louisville's famous horse races? Source: Sports Illustrated

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail

Created by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 02:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

I would go for the alternative hook as it is more interesting and the original hook is a bit unclear. Echetus Xe 17:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]