Jump to content

Talk:Rachel Barkow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Counterclerk or not?

[edit]

Bender, I know Rachel Barkow. Despite the fact that the Schneider Mayerson article said she was the "counterclerk" for Justice Scalia, she was not. Her co-clerk was. Please remove the counterclerk reference. Thanks. 128.122.253.212 (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is a source that claims she was the counterclerk, but no source that claims the opposite. Wikipedia Guidelines prohibit authors "from drawing on their personal knowledge without citing their sources". So unless you find a source for your claim, we're going to leave the article as it is. --bender235 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just because there's a source doesn't mean it's true, and just because there's no source doesn't mean it's not true. Have you ever heard of the media getting something wrong? 128.122.253.228 (talk) 14:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But that's how it is. --bender235 (talk) 14:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, verifiability and reliable sources is how it is. Rd232 talk 09:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rachel Barkow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]