Talk:Racemization

Chemistry High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jwong61. Peer reviewers: Linnikh.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image of a racemic mixture being formed

A picture is worth a thousand words. Anyone else feel that a reaction showing the concept of this would go a long way? If anyone has the skill I think a very simply example using something like fluro-chloro-methanol or something would go a long way to explain this! --Robert Stone, Jr. 09:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this what you want - Image:SN1Stereochemistry.png? It was at the SN1 article. Parutakupiu ^{talk || contribs} 02:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Add to Wikiproject

I notice you haven't added this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemistry. You may be able to find more collaborators there. Good luck. Xiner (talk, email) 03:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this: "The two forms, which are non-superimposable when rotated in 3 dimensional space, are said to be diastereomers." say enantiomers instead of diastereomers? Chiral molecules that are non-superimposable on their mirror molecule are enantiomers right? --Vearod (talk) 13:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation?

How is this word pronounced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.162.27 (talk) 00:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Edits

I would like to add a clarification of the terminology used to describe enantiomers such as the use of D, L, R, and S. Also, the page could benefit from a link to the history of Pasteur's discovery of optically active mixtures and more information on the real-world application of racemic mixtures such as in drugs and amino acids. --Jwong61 (talk) 21:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is content on this page under the Biological Significance heading that has no references listed which is concerning because much of the same information can be found on other websites and even a journal article. However, I cannot confirm which came first. If I cannot find sources for the previously written information in this section, I propose rewriting it with new sources. Any input would be welcomed. --Jwong61 (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merging of pages

Based on the similarity of content between the Racemization page and the Racemic mixture page, are there any thoughts on the merging of these two pages? --Jwong61 (talk) 20:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Honors Organic Chemistry I

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 2 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Holley62, DavisGL529 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by DavisGL529 (talk) 21:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]