Talk:Rabina Khan

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 July 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV

I detect some pov-pushing in relation to this article, particularly problematic as she is a candidate for public office. PatGallacher (talk) 23:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPSPS states; "Never use self-published sources – including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets – as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below). "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs. Some news organizations host online columns that they call blogs, and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control. Posts left by readers are never acceptable as sources.".

The self-published sources added by the WP:SPA all appear to fail WP:RS: The sources about expenses from a personal blog and a non-neutral opposition party website fail WP:V, as well as this one (also from a blog) regarding the election court ruling, therefore these should all be removed. In this source, there is no mention of the claim that the subject's husband is a member of Islamic Forum of Europe therefore this should also be removed as per WP:SYNTH. Tanbircdq (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected

I have temporarily fully protected the page, y'all have three days to sort out whatever mess this edit war is over, keeping in mind WP:BLP and WP:RS. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

Does this person meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines? The highest office achieved is borough councilor - there are 10s of thousands of them across the Uk Cantab12 (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of self promotion going on by the agents of minuscule politicians in Tower Hamlets (who typically come from the 'independent' faction at the council which has been harshly condemned for endemic corruption); I think these political self-promotion examples are neither neutral nor notable should all be deleted.Aetheling1125 19:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

This seems to be the recreation of an article after a decision to delete. I don't know how to track down the previous discussion. Anyone know? Ian McDonald (talk) 23:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some changes to remove utterly superfluous dross but I think this article ought to be (re)nominated for deletion. Rabina Khan has not received significant coverage in national newspapers.Aetheling1125 17:22, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

If you took the time to check all the sources in the article, then you would know that the very first one on the page is a national newspaper (there is a big clue in its title, The National). The subject has also been featured on BBC News. She has also received significant coverage in other reliable sources including The Muslim News and East London Advertiser for her European Diversity Award win. Tanbircdq (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The National is not a national paper in England (in which Tower Hamlets are still currently a part of!), it is not! -- Urquhartnite (talk) 01:07, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Child names

Hi Tanbircdq. It is the WP:BLPNAME bit "is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject" that leads me to believe child names should not be included. I cannot see how knowing her children's names leads to any significantly better understanding of Rabina Khan, so their privacy IMO should be respected. In more context the policy statement is "The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members .... names of any immediate ... family members ... subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject." So I think they should be removed. IMO just because they are in a good cite is not enough. Rwendland (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rabina Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.asiansinmedia.org/news/article.php/publishing/1737

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]