Talk:Ra'il I'Nasah Kiam

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Black Lives Matter

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the article, always great to see non-binary activists in the spotlight! Since two of the sources, Slate and ABC, use xir birth name, it could be helpful to mention it just once in the lead (I was confused at first and didn't realize it was the same person that Slate was talking about). Also, if I'Nasah Kiam uses both xe and they pronouns, I believe they/them is recommended on Wikipedia for readability, as some people are sadly less familiar with neopronouns.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 10:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay to remove tags?

Hi all!

Encylopedic tone

I'm a longtime editor, but someone with only limited knowledge of this subject (and no conflict of interest). I responded to a request for assistance, and have (I think / I hope?) edited to make the tone more encyclopedic.

As such, I'd like to remove that tag. However, that feels as if it would be a wee bit self-serving to do that less than 24 hours after my edits, so I figure I'll ask here first, and flag a couple of people who've put their fingers into the article, so they can come check it out now (Paging: Paigeb4, Demuretsy, Chaotic Enby, Heavy Grasshopper). If there isn't any significant disagreement in, say, a week, then I'll go ahead and remove the tag. If it's mostly there, I hope you'll just help fix it yourself. Of course, if I'm out to lunch, and it's nowhere near, please say so!

AshleyMorton (talk) 20:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Sources

At this point, the article cites 12 sources, of which 3 are authored by the subject of the article, and the main body of the article doesn't (to my eyes) "rely" overmuch on those primary sources for anything that seems debatable (e.g. it seems reasonable to cite a primary source regarding the thought process going into the person's own name - it would be quite different if the cited primary source was basically "What I did was sooooo notable, because..."). The article also contains a significant number of cross-links within Wikipedia to additional information regarding points it mentions. As above, if this doesn't seem right to you, speak up, but this seems ready to have this tag removed. Because I had less to do with this part of things, and it feels like less of a judgement call, I'm going to go ahead and remove this tag but, clearly, I'm happy to discuss things if you disagree.

AshleyMorton (talk) 20:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]